It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
In lowercase letters. And referring to how "good" or "bad" something is, for lack of a better explanation.
Quality seems like a simple to grasp concept, but I have not been able to understand it for some reason. I would think it to be relative and personal, yet so many people consider it in absolute and universal terms. For example, what makes one movie better than the other? Is, say, a lighthearted comedy or silly action movie inherently inferior to a serious drama? Can you measure the quality of a movie on a linear scale like reviews tend to do, or does personal experience lead one to be more connected with certain movies over others? Can you be right or wrong about liking certain things, and why?
Comments
Would it be perhaps the end-result?
Or something more person-to-person basis.
People can eat a ham that was cooked at 300 degrees and thinks it's good, but does that make it quality ham? Or is the person just a niche fan of undercooked hams.
It's certainly a dilemma, Niche fans of undercooked hams will see more quality in an undercooked Ham than people going for a fully cooked ham.
Yeah, it's pretty subjective.
Well, you can make it objective if you decide on some standardized way of measuring it objectively. But that involves making an assumption, and isn't the intrinsic definition.