If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
A long time ago, when I first decided that filmmaking was what I wanted to do, I had some notion of all the different adaptions and remakes I wanted to make, silly me.
I also used to think that the directors who write and make these movies were...not as "high class" or "good" as the directors who do original things.
I don't know why. It just bugs me.
Comments
The Expendables is not an adaptation but is still a more creatively bankrupt and cynical cash-in.
There's your answer.
Coming soon: Schindler's List 2013.
^Yay.
The story goes he was laughed out of the room right after finishing the sentence.
I really hope it's true. it would give me more faith in Hollywood.
Except The Invasion (remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers). That was an awesome movie. I actually watched it thrice and loved it every time.
We are in kind of Remake Hell right now though, and I really wish it would end.
Of course, what "closer to the book" means is a matter of debate (as I've learned through constant Bakshi LOTR vs. Jackson LOTR arguments... you can show that most scenes in Bakshi's film and even much of the dialogue come from and play out exactly like in the book, but they'll insist that Jackson was more accurate).
So, a director wants to direct a remake or adaptation to some property.How does he go about doing that, besides being asked to be the director?
Does he go through the process of writing a script and pitching it?
But what about in the event that there is no official script, but you want to do it.
I should look up how Bay went about Transformers.
I actually agree that being true to the spirit is more important than being true to the text (Jurassic Park succeeds in that capacity). The thing is I think Bakshi's version (of LOTR) nailed both while Jackson's nailed neither.
Don't get me wrong, what Jackson did was certainly an impressive feat. But it wasn't Lord of the Rings.
Was Nolan asked to do Batman?
Hmmm...I wonder what adaptations directors decided, they just wanted to do, and then did them.