If you have an email ending in @hotmail.com, @live.com or @outlook.com (or any other Microsoft-related domain), please consider changing it to another email provider; Microsoft decided to instantly block the server's IP, so emails can't be sent to these addresses.
If you use an @yahoo.com email or any related Yahoo services, they have blocked us also due to "user complaints"
-UE
"I get more views than you do, therefore I don't have to listen to criticism"
I have not heard anyone outside of targets of Retsupuraes use this line of argumentation until recently.
Comments
^ As I said in the other thread, I have no great love for Troper Tales. I just don't think the This Troper series is harmful enough to force us to delete all TT articles throughout the site instead of focusing on eliminating or fixing the problem ones.
The logical next step for those who feel that Troper Tales is causing major problems would be to identify the problem pages and address them individually. While this will admittedly be a lot of work, it seems like something worth doing for those who seem to be passionate about this matter.
The thing is, I rarely see the same people who insist that Troper Tales must be done away with being willing to work on curating/flagging individual pages for deletion. It seems to be an all or nothing deal in many cases.
You need to elaborate in your OPs, man. In this very thread some of us were not sure if this was about Elbeem's comments, and we only suspected that in the first place because it happened on this site and your posting style.
Not all of us keep up with every thread, poster or event that goes on in TV Tropes, philosophy blogs or Retsupurae. It gets tiring when often the OP is a cryptic statement and the first 10 or so post is deciphering what the subject matter is and why you hate it.
Threads like this would fit better on others and wouldn't look as petty, but if you want to make them anyway, at least let us know what you're talking about.
that I don't want that. I believe it's too much hassle for something so
worthless. And, most importantly, the damage is already done. We have
our very own thread were we dig those out for posterity, there's a YT
series which purpose is to dig those out, there's a SA thread that digs
those out too. Most importantly, I believe that TT's existence is
just...well, a mistake, and I don't see any other way to correct that
mistake than a nuke.
While I respect your position, you have to understand how it looks to someone from the outside: mainly, that Troper Tales is a problem enough that you're willing to have it resolved by a nuke from on high, but not enough of a problem to require hard work at a personal level.
Once it's acknowledged that the nuclear option is off the table, further arguments to that effect stop being productive, and start to look like needless griping. Anyone who feels that Troper Tales should go, but who is unwilling to put in the effort to deal with individual pages comes across as a person not being willing to put their money where their mouth is, as the saying goes.
I can't really provide you with an argument for Troper Tales' usefulness outside of what has been stated already in the Wiki Talk thread, since I personally would not shed a tear if Eddie reversed his position and deleted them all tomorrow. That would only bug me insofar as it would be going against the consensus reached back in December during the Goon Invasion, which was a consensus Eddie himself participated in reaching.
My point has been that, given the reality that some editors want them to stay and Eddie has twice indicated that there would be no mass deletion, the only option left for those who feel the need to protect the site's reputation is to deal with the pages individually. Whether they have the will to do so is the only remaining question.
think that their word is law and cannot be rebuked? or how people with a
higher ranking on certain games/tournaments will do the same?
Similar, but not the same. Since postcounts only indicate how much time a person dedicates to a forum, not the actual reputation level of said user. As for the latter, it's the inverse, someone's ranking in a game is usually an indication of their skill and therefore their opinion on the game itself has more weight depending on it.